Some economists have urged the CBN to identify and address the bottlenecks associated with the cash swap policy as old Naira notes cease to be legal tender.

The experts, who made the appeal in separate interviews with the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Lagos, said that it was necessary to ease tension emanating from the cash swap policy.

 

They were reacting to the Supreme Court’s adjournment of the suit filed by some state governments challenging the Feb. 10 deadline set by CBN to end the use of old Naira notes.

Mr. Johnson Chukwu, Managing Director, of Cowry Asset Management, said that the situation at hand was no longer a case of judicial directive or order, but about what should be done to relieve the pressure on citizens.

 

“I have argued repeatedly that CBN can order the commercial banks to pay as much as N100,000 over the counter; if they do that and people are able to withdraw at least N100,000 per week, I believe the pressure will come down and people will get some relieve,’’ he said.

 

According to him, the apex bank has made its position clear that the old currency notes are no longer legal tender after Feb. 10.

 

He said that the apex bank did not flout any order of the Supreme Court as it (CBN) was not joined in the suit.

 

In the same vein, Ndubisi Nwokoma, Professor of Financial Economics and Director, of the Centre for Economic Policy Analysis and Research, University of Lagos, Akoka, urged the apex bank to identify bottlenecks and address them.

 

“I think CBN should make an effort to identify where the bottlenecks are and address them. They need to enhance the printing of the redesigned Naira notes and their effective distribution through deposit money banks.

 

“The battle over the old notes and the Supreme Court case, in my view, is largely about the 2023 elections and the incidence of vote buying.

 

“The battle is less about the current sufferings of the ordinary person and more about the interests of some politicians who have stashed away huge sums of the old notes for use in mobilizing for the elections.”

 

He urged Nigerians to support the apex bank’s policy, saying that CBN’s position on old notes ceasing to be legal tender after Feb. 10, appears reasonable enough for public support, “at least to protect the integrity of the 2023 elections”.

 

Akpan Ekpo, a professor of Economics and Public Policy at the University of Uyo, Akwa Ibom, who described the postponement as “unfortunate’’, wished the court had delivered judgment on the matter.

 

“But, I think the Supreme Court is the highest court in the land. The Central Bank is not bigger than the Nigerian Constitution.

 

“All government agencies, organs, and so on, are supposed to enforce Supreme Court’s order and everybody has to obey it.

 

“My concern is that until February 22, the old notes have to be accepted in line with the new ones, that’s my understanding. So, everybody should be patient and wait until February 22,’’ he said.

 

In his view, Prof. Sherifdeen Tella of the Economics Department of Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun, argued that the Supreme Court’s failure to punish CBN for flouting its order was what was fueling the confusion in the economy.

 

“The postponement of hearing on the CBN policy may be in order if the court feels it needs time.

 

“But failure to punish those flouting its orders, including the CBN, that the old Naira remains acceptable for transactions, is fueling the confusion in the economy.

 

“Does anyone need to go to court separately to sue for violation of court order by CBN, banks, and even a court in Lagos?” Tella queried.

 

Uche Uwaleke, Professor of Capital Market at the Nasarawa State University, Keffi, said, “ the postponement will only heighten the anxiety and uncertainty currently pervading the economic environment, especially against the backdrop of the fact that the CBN has maintained Feb. 10, as the date the old notes cease to be legal tender.”

 

The Supreme Court of Nigeria has adjourned the suit on the Naira swap policy to Feb. 22, to allow it to consolidate all cases on the matter emanating from nine more states of the Federation seeking to be joined in the suit.

The initial states that dragged the government to court over the matter were Kaduna, Kogi, and Zamfara.


In the suit, they challenged the legality of the Naira swap policy of the federal government.


In a ruling on Wednesday, a seven-member panel, led by Justice John Okoro, the apex court joined the Attorneys-General of Katsina, Lagos, Ondo, Ogun, Ekiti, Cross River, and Sokoto States as co-plaintiffs, while the Attorneys-General of Edo and Bayelsa states were joined as co-respondents.


The court has, however, fixed the hearing of the case to Feb. 22.


Consequently, the court ordered the original plaintiffs and the respondents, the attorney-general of the federation, and the minister of justice to amend the processes already filed to reflect the new parties.

 
Back To Top

Want your friends to read this?

Hit the buttons below to share...